Alveolar Mucosa Growing over the Implants and Locator attachments: How to Control This?

Dr. L. asks:

I treatment planned a patient for a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 implants and Locator attachments. The mandible is atrophic with almost no ridge. I referred the patient for placement of the implants. When the patient returned, the implants were lingual to the ridge almost in the floor of the mouth. The surgeon felt that this was the only viable position for the implants due to the lack of bone support and ridge atrophy. My problem is that the alveolar mucosa keeps growing over the implants and Locator attachments. Is there anything I can do to control this situation?

Editor’s Note: Please see new case photos below that we recently uploaded:

26 Comments on Alveolar Mucosa Growing over the Implants and Locator attachments: How to Control This?

New comments are currently closed for this post.
gary omfs
3/13/2012
No, you can't. In this kind of situation (lingual undercut) co- axis implants can sometimes be the solution, but too late for that now. If the implants aren't integrated better have them removed, if they are, the patient's in for a lot of trouble, and so are you. Higher locators; local hygiene with chx gel and excision of excessive mucosa on a regular base are all you can provide...
Dry
3/13/2012
I had a similar case recently,except that the implants were placed labially in the anterior mandible. After excising the excess tissue only to have it grow back almost immediately I finally resolved the problem by placing longer abutments. Worth a try. Good luck!
James Holman, DDS
4/6/2012
Aren't these implants on the labial aspect of the ridge, rather than on the lingual?
Dr. D Kevin Moore
3/13/2012
Sorry to hear about your frustration. Could you please verify that you have a zone of attached gingiva circumferentially around the implant? From what I gather, you only have mucosa. IMHO not ideal for overall implant health. If this is the case consider grafting this area to provide optimal tissue zones.
Dr L
3/13/2012
Youre right- its basically surrounded by FOM mucosa
Dr G J Berne
3/13/2012
I am having a little difficulty understanding what is happening. Usually in the severely resorbed mandible, the ridge shrinks downwards and forwards, so I am having a little difficulty visuallizing lingually placed implants. To me, lingually placed implants in a severely resorbed ridge means the implants are placed in the sublingual space.Clearly I have got the wrong picture. However as to your dilemma about the gingiva growing over the implants, this usually occurs because there is a space available to allow the gingiva to grow into. Perhaps the denture need relining.
Leal
3/14/2012
I wouldn't say more. Agree 100%.
Theodore Grossman DMD
3/13/2012
clinical pictures & digital pano. will help us understand your predicament.
Dr. Omar Olalde
3/13/2012
Agree, it would be useful some pictures. I'm confused, but with the information you gave and the implants are paralel enough, you can use transmucosal abutments or higher locators. Or "Castable locators", so your lab can do some personalized abutments and give them the proper angle and height. http://www.zestanchors.com/images/articles/article_117_LOCATOR%20IMPLANT%20QUICK%20REFERENCE%20GUIDE.pdf
Jennifer Watters
3/13/2012
Wonder if it is anatomically possible or impossible to send to a surgeon for some vestibular push back (of mucosa) and if possible, graft in a small bit Mucograft or a thin free gingival graft. I did this for a case with implants labially placed in mucosa with locator attachments and it helped. This would be difficult if not impossible if there is no vertical bone height left and it is level with the floor of the mouth. Please post some photos if you can.
smileartist
3/14/2012
This is why surgeons must begin to master the mini implant technique, which avoids all of this problem! Go to a course. It's just another tool, stop using the wrong tool! Take em out and refer for minis after healing!!
osseonews
3/14/2012
Dr. L recently posted case photos to go along with this question. Please refer to the recently uploaded case photos at the top of the page. Thank you.
smileartist
3/14/2012
Thanks for photo and X-rays, this is precisely what I a referring to in my comment, ideal mini case, lousy standard case, get with the standard of care or insist in cbct guided surgery with soft tissue augmentation by your surgeon for standard implant placement, you are responsible for results, not recommendations! Good luck. Ps: At least attend a mini implant course to understand the options for atrophic mandibles, you do not have to place if you don't choose to, but your patients deserve to know all of their options! Then find a surgeon willing to offer both options above, case can be handled either way, but not if standard plan is inadequate!
Baker vinci
3/14/2012
Smiledoc, minis are not "the standard of care", in this situation. The vestibuloplasty is a good suggestion, but should it have been done pre-impant? Retrospectivly, this patient would have been better served, with the implants further back and approaching the inferior border. Sorry, for the "armchair bomb"! Does she have a yeast infection?? Bv
Smileartist
3/19/2012
I beg to differ , baker Vinci, but mini implants are clearly more standard of care for atrophic mandibles with minimum attached gingiva than improperly and under prepared standards, let the implant fit the mandible whenever possible. Four properly selected, planned, and placed mini implants will perform equal to the unnecessarily wide standard implants (which creates the difficulty in placement to start with) in every parameter, retention, stability, ease of care and longevity, read the literature, after all, the standard of care is 'first do no harm'. Continued resistance to non-standard diameter implants, whether mini diameter or wide diameter (such as the 7-8-9mm socket implants) is due to brainwashing, not current literature. I don't disagree with properly placed two locator standard Implant cases on division A and B mandibles, but I do object to closed minds, the standard of care is evolving my friend, so must we, otherwise we'd all still be placing under branemark's original specifications.
Baker vinci
3/21/2012
Smile doc, the oath of Hippocrates, is "do no harm". Again the "standard of care" is what is typically done in your part of the world. I know readers are getting sick of seeing this defined, so many times, but until it is understood, it must be said. At the most recent AO meeting a questionare was evaluated, with regards to what doctors feel is the best choice for the atrophic mandible, with 8 mm of bone or more and the overwhelming response, was standard implants. Most suggested, only two, in the severe case. I have a very open mind, in that this website had changed, a lot of what I do, with the exception of using good common sense and sound scientific principles. This case in particular, has attached mucosa, but not in the floor of the mouth. I use mini implants, rarely and when I'm done with them, they screw right on out. If you suggest mini implants are the better option, in this case, I will emphatically suggest you are "off base". Remember this is just my little opinion, so let's not get our undies in a wad! Bv
Baker vinci
3/14/2012
Since the implants appear to have been placed in the FOM, minis maybe a better alternative. They can simply be removed, with little or no trauma. Bv
Dr. D Kevin Moore
3/14/2012
Thanks for posting the photos... they are worth a thousand words! Here's what I'd do: 1) Vestibuloplasty or at least a partial one. 2) Replace locator abutments with corrected tissue heights (once the implants are surrounded by attached gingiva.) 3) reline plate for new tissue height/new locators 4) get hug from patient because you figured out "what the problem was" and corrected it! LOL I'd call the surgeon who placed the implants and ask him/her to rectify this issue immediately. Thorough treatment planning of this case would have told you and the surgeon that the patient will need soft tissue surgery along with the implants. Sorry that you learned this the hard way. Now, the patient is looking at YOU (inappropriately) as "the guy that can't make my denture fit". You will NEVER correct this without attached gingiva surrounding the implants, nor could you expect the implants to have a long life! I hate to say it but whoever placed the implants for you needs some training in BASIC implant principles! ie what kind of tissue should surround the implants, and how much of it! (2mm of attached gingiva all the around is ideal!) Hope that helps!
Baker vinci
3/15/2012
These implants must be coming out of the submandibular ducts ! There is attached tissue, it happens to be where the implants belong. My advice, in this situation, is to "sleep" these impants, assuming they are bone level, with the covers on and if not, remove them and graft the area and place the implants where they belong; just in front of the anterior aspect of the mental nerve and as close to the inferior border as possible. If a cbct scan would have been utilized, with or without a guide, this would have been avoided, most likely. I would also advise the surgeon that placed these, "to help out ".sorry, if this seems harsh, but until the implants are in the correct position, you will be "chasing your tail". Bv
jim
3/15/2012
Remove locator abutments and placed a bar with overdenture clips.
Baker vinci
3/15/2012
Jim, I'm not sure that can be done, effectively . Again, I don't restore implants, but I do know where they belong and if I don't , I ask. Can you put angled abutements and a bar on these?? Bv
jim
3/16/2012
I believe that you can take an implant level, open-tray impression and the lab can make parallel abutments with a screw-down hader bar. Then, you could use clips. I would be concerned hanging ERAs off the distals if the posterior ridge is also of poor anatomy. Only time I'd consider ERAs is if the ridge in the posterior denture area can support the denture well.
Dr L
3/18/2012
Thanks Jim ill have a look at that. Just a question though- will this help stop any of the mucosa creeping up around the bar abutments? and then cause issues of hygiene obstruction?
Baker vinci
3/25/2012
Dr. L, I'm afraid the answer is no. Even if you were to detach the genial tubercles and reposition the attachment of the genioglossus muscle and have someone do a splitthickness skin graft, these implants are essentially good for one thing, and that is preventing atrophy. Maybe you could sent it to an ENT!!??
Dr. Gerald Rudick
4/3/2012
It would be good to know the brand of the implants placed......in any case most of the manufacturers are making angulated Trans Mucosal Abutments ( TMA's ) These specialized abutments, available from Adin Dental Implants of Israel, would work for most internally hexed implants, have the distinct advantage of being angulated, so that they would reposition the emergence profile and add height to clear soft mucosal tissue; and the locator attachments could be fitted and the problem solved. Gerald Rudick dds Montreal, Canada
Richard Hughes, DDS, FAAI
4/7/2012
Consider custom made abutments for the root forms, a mandibular subperiosteal implant, or a ramus frame implant.

Featured Products

OsteoGen Bone Grafting Plug
Combines bone graft with a collagen plug to yield the easiest and most affordable way to clinically deliver bone graft for socket preservation.
CevOss Bovine Bone Graft
Make the switch to a better xenograft! High volume of interconnected pores promotes new bone. Substantially equivalent to BioOss and NuOss.