Compatibility of Implants and Abutments from Different Manufacturers?

Some of my colleagues have been talking about buying dental implants at low cost from independent manufacturers and then buying the abutments from more established implant companies. It would seem that everything should be compatible, but are all of these components truly interchangeable from the different companies? Anyone mixing and matching implants and abutments from different companies now? How is it working out?

24 Comments on Compatibility of Implants and Abutments from Different Manufacturers?

New comments are currently closed for this post.
Charles Sutera III
5/31/2013
Purposely interchanging implants and abutments for the sole purpose of cost is absolutely unacceptable. Use the products as the manufacturers intend or it could end up haunting the clinician. I recommend choosing surgical and prosthetic implant components based on merit and their characteristics. Consider attributes like composition, presence of Morse taper, type of connection (ie internal hex), thread type, ability to platform switch, taper vs straight, etc. If stocking both surgical and restorative components is too costly for a practice only provide one of those services for a period of time.
CRS
6/1/2013
I fear that if you are ever sued by an unhappy patient the fact that parts were mixed with your knowledge will most likely be warrantee issue and you ill be thrown under the bus. That's why I like to use the bigger companies who most likely will be around in the future and have decent track records. A smaller company with a good track record is great too! If you're skimping to save money, re-evaluate our business plan. Interesting since if I had to stock all the abutments instead of good inventory control I would be losing money also. Don't penalize the patient on an inventory issue.
Richard Hughes, DDS, FAAI
6/1/2013
This is not a problem, if they fit. Implant warrantee is usually not the issue in a law suite. I use parts from AB Dental, MIS, Implant Direct and Zimmer, attachments international and they all fit. I also use Blue Sky Bio for Straumman parts. Bule Sky Bio gives great personal service and they really care about helping the doctor. I have had no problems with Blue Sky Bio. AB Dental, MIS, Blue Sky and attachments international do a superlative quality control job.
CRS
6/1/2013
One of the first things a lawyer will do is read warranties and manuals they don't think like we do. You'd be surprised what they ask it is leaving a loophole that they love. I would not give them the chance just to save a few bucks. The average patient or juror will wonder also. It is different if it is the only available option trust me.
Richard Hughes, DDS, FAAI
6/2/2013
If the parts fit, the parts fit. A warrantee is not going to protest a doc in a law suit. If the doc maintains a strong dr patient relationship, treats the patient right, performs the surgeries correctly, plans the case right, uses a lab that knows what they are doing, does not over complicate the case and yes, carefully select the patient, things rarely happen. You also have to educate the patient on OH. You have to ask yourself and the patient, what caused the loss of the teeth? Are we doing the patient right by restoring with implant prosthesis. You have to ask if the knock offs are such a big issue, then how can these companies legally do this? Some knock off mfg produce a better product than the original mfg. To each their owne. I refuse to use implants from certain big five mfg because of quality control.
CRS
6/2/2013
Yes you are right Richard, and I only place not restore so I respect your opinion and experience. Also one can always find an expert to testify either way. Thanks for sharing
KGH
6/4/2013
Implant companies manufacture their implants and abutments to specific tolerances. Then companies reverse engineer their copies of these implants/abutments and have to guess at the exact dimensions and tolerances. Components can be mixed and matched however there is a significant risk that abutment screws will come loose too easily and require frequent visits for the patient's abutment screws to be retightened. This is especially true with regard to single-tooth abutments because the fit has to be very precise so the abutment doesn't have any ability to work itself loose from the implant.
Mike
6/4/2013
Dr. Richard Hughes, I find your comments very scary. That's like taking my Rolex in for repair and the repairman decides to use knock-off parts. We are dealing with precision connections that are placed under hundreds of thousands of repeated load cycles. Poor fit results in micro-mobility and micro-mobility results in bacterial leakage and screw loosening and bone loss. The screw is the only thing that is "compatible", nothing else. KGH, you hit the nail on the head. Don't mix and match "compatible" parts just because they "fit".
FDM
6/4/2013
I personally prefer an engineering approach. There is no half fit or partial compatibility. All these parts are manufactured on CNC milling or lathe machines. There are two measurement systems metric and imperial. There are standard threads for screws. Any manufacturing process has precision tolerance that is very high. The original part within different lots may have deviations of the dimensions too. One can take an original part and measure it with a microscope to the precision of 1 micron. Having Japanese or South Korean top line milling machines one can manufacture utmost quality parts. I've received today a letter from Straumann saying that due to the tough economic situation they reorganize their company. I would suggest them to start the reorganization by matching their prices to the price lists of Implant Direct and Blue Sky Bio and similar companies.
Terry Giorno
6/4/2013
Mike and KGH are exactly right. WHen doing quality control on a complex abutment, a manufacture checks more than 24 measurements and compare them to the drawing specifications. The drawing spells the measurement +/- tolerance. There is NO way in the whole world that reverse engineering provides that, unless performed on a significant number of specimen.... Consequence is a lesser mechanical performance of clones Vs original parts. There is an ISO 14801 standard to assess fatigue of dental implants. Anyone want to compare a Brand Abutment on a Brand implant Vs CLone Abutment on the same Brand implant? Terry
KGH
6/4/2013
Agreed! You can measure components for days and still not be able to identify the mean tolerances and exact OEM engineering specs. Even if you have a statistically significant sample of the OEM components; there is no guarantee as to where those particular are in the +/- OEM engineering spec tolerance ranges.
RRO
6/4/2013
In the early 1990's, implant parts did not fit well. Does anyone remember "Threaded Time Transfer?" As the 1990's progressed, ISO standards entered the picture. Implant companies machine parts to perfections per ISO standards and to specific sizes and types. In a company like Zimmer, BioHorizons, Blue Sky Bio, Implant Direct, American Dental Implants, MIS, etc makes an abutment that does not fit the corresponding size of a different company, it is most likely it will not fit their own implant. I often use and implant I like ( I have surgical kits form 7 companies) for a specific case and then when I restore it I order the abutment that serves my purposes best regardless if it comes from the company that made the implant I have used. Additionally, I do my own lab work for most of my cases and as of yet I have not found parts that did not fit between companies. I do not want to be limited to which implant I use not which abutment I select. I want it to last long and serve my purposes well. Just as a side note, in the early 1990's I ordered some parts from Nobel and they came with metal shavings. That was not unusual for that day. The parts were machined and when 1,000 abutments were made, the first several hundred were good, the last 1-2 hundred were not so good because the burs used in that lot were wearing out. Hence the importance of ISO standards and the wonderful milling machines used by all manufactures today.
Terry Giorno
6/5/2013
RRO, The point is that what you call a part fitting is IRRELEVANT to the fact may not be "as per specifications". This WILL translate in early failure in a fatigue testing. Clinically, fitting means "absence of wobbling". That is far from "as per specs", and not sufficient to deliver optimal mechanical performance. It is interesting to notice on Medline, that the number of published articles discussing mechanical failures of implants components, has been increasing exponentially over the last 3 years, and this trend is increasing....
RRO
1/5/2017
I have restored hundreds of cases over the last 15 years switching components between compatible companies. Abutment failure rate: 0%.
sergio
6/5/2013
I use abutments from different companies often. Ever had an issue? Nope. I've heard this argument before too many times... There are lots who claim that abutments have to be ordered by the same company that made the implant that's in and otherewise there will be chance of lawsuit, unfitting issue, ethical issue... etc.. And most of them in my expereince turned out to be reps from big implant companies or some one who has interest in those companies..
Richard Hughes, DDS, FAAI
6/5/2013
Mike, the key word is"compatible". I only use parts from reputable companies. One cannot use cloned parts for certain implant systems and some you can.
Frank Avason DMD,MS
6/5/2013
Has anyone of the above dentists who nay-say this been sued before over an implant case and if so, has using different companies parts been a part of the suit?
JS
6/5/2013
The original question was about buying dental implants at low cost from independent manufacturers and then buying the abutments from more established implant companies. I don't get why anyone would do that. If I choose Blue Sky Bio (or in my case Hiossen) I will save a few hundred dollars on the implant, healing abutment, etc. Why would I then choose to buy incompatible abutments (or maybe acceptably compatible) from the more expensive companies? If I already used a less expensive implant and it has integrated well and I saved money, wouldn't it make sense to use the compatible parts from the same company that have the best chance of fitting perfectly into my implant?
Richard HUghes, DDS, FAAI
6/5/2013
Mike, I did not mean to scare you! Shame on me. All kidding aside. I have not had problems with MIS, AB dental, CoreVent, Attachments International and Blue Sky Bio. I have had some issues with Astra, Straumann and 3i. You will be surprised who makes what for who. There have been and still are manufacturers (some of the big five) that make bad parts.
CRS
6/6/2013
Very interesting I myself am unhappy with the customer service of big companies on returns tec. I do pay top dollar for the implant bodies and trust my restoring doctors with their abutment choices. I do think the implant companies are greedy and may go the way of General Motors if they do not change. It is the market place. They make you buy a complete kit when you may only need a few items. And I see by reading the intent of this blog that all posters want to do the right thing for their patients clinical, mechanical and keeping costs reasonable. Anything labeled "dental"seems like there is a big markup. Sometimes I feel like an ATM .
Richard Hughes, DDS, FAAI
6/7/2013
CRS and JS, Both of you hit the nail on the head. I use an internal hex 90% of the time. I buy form AB dental or MIS. They are inexpensive and of high quality. They are are not the big five, but I can call them and buy parts etc without buying a big kit. They are smaller and flexible , so they can give the customer great service. Blue Sky Bio is the same. Yes they sell product but they know they are they are the under dog. They try harder. Bicon also gives great service and a great product. I do not have nor have I found a problem with any of the above companies! Impladent is another company that gives great service and has great products at a reasonable price! All this said, I pass the savings on to my patients.
Stanley, dr.dent.med.
1/5/2017
Just one first hand information...80% implants are produced in just couple of factories located in Israel. Yes, guys even Nobel produce there. This is reason for cross fit of many "different" implants and they are really identical, only difference is box and ofcourse if you insist to buy "Made in Germany" (really placed in box in Germany) you will pay 100-200% more. I placed personally over 1000 implants and produce screw retained restorations for over 10 years without problems. So I do not even use "original" abutments but mill at least 70%. Problems arose if doctor don't work as dr.Richard nicely stated. You need right patient You need correct and optimal planning and execution of surgery and very very precise technical work. And still it is impossible to predict what will happen in longterm but if all steps are done as it should be, risk for complications (patient related and implant related) are inside acceptable area. So the risk is ALWAYS present.
sherif
1/29/2018
can i ask about comptability with pitt-easy implant
Regis Petrozziello
5/3/2018
I just want to know if there have been any reports of any screw breaking or loosening or breaks at all when using a 3I abutment with a Zimmer implant

Featured Products

OsteoGen Bone Grafting Plug
Combines bone graft with a collagen plug to yield the easiest and most affordable way to clinically deliver bone graft for socket preservation.
CevOss Bovine Bone Graft
Make the switch to a better xenograft! High volume of interconnected pores promotes new bone. Substantially equivalent to BioOss and NuOss.