Failed Megagen Implant for Overdenture with Locators: Thoughts?

I placed 6 dental implants(4-upper, 2- lower) 12 weeks ago, Megagen 3.5x10mm implants. This was for an upper overdenture with bar on Locators and lower on Locators. I buried all the implants. However, during the second stage as I tried to uncover the implants and place healing abutments, I noticed all had integrated very well except UR4 – which came out straight away. After taking another CBCT scan, which showed buccal and palatal placed intact, I curetted the osteotomy site and placed a wider and longer implant than the first time(4×11.5mm). I noticed that the implant had good primary stability second time, but looking back I wish I had placed some graft around the implant neck as it shows some gap. Is this going to be an issue? Please see picture attached. Kindly advise.


11 Comments on Failed Megagen Implant for Overdenture with Locators: Thoughts?

New comments are currently closed for this post.
Peter Hunt
6/27/2019
This situation is akin to doing an immediate placement into an extraction socket. You have the implant stable which is an absolute requirement. Rough surface implants are better at "bridging" than smooth surface/ machined surfaces but in a gap of this size we would always augment. It would be safer and simpler if the implant had been placed a little deeper and if the marginal gap had been grafted with a material which encourages osteoconduction and contains collagen. The collagen gels and tends to seal and protect the region from infection and infiltration in the first few critical days. We usually place a healing cap and bring the bone / collagen mixture up around the healing cap to form a type of "Safety Zone". We then bring the flaps up around the healing cap and close with sutures. Using this protocol there is no need for primary coverage and we get a thicker more bound down and mature zone of attached gingiva around the implant when it's time to remove the healing cap and take the final impression. At this time in your situation, you should hope that natural "bridging" will kick in for you. There would be no point in going back at this stage. I wish you the best!
Joseph Kim, DDS, JD
6/27/2019
How did you have a gap from a failed 3.5? It will probably be okay if there is no movement to the implant. Placing graft material in this gap is probably not necessary, any your flap design should aid in healing.
Guru
6/27/2019
I was surprised when I partially raised the flap. Implant def had a good stability after the placement and not a spinner. And I got a good closure around the healing abutment.
Guru
6/27/2019
Thank you for your comments. On the hind sight I wish I had done some augmentation. Since the implant had enough stability I disnt think it was necessary. Hope it will bridge the gap.
Dok
6/27/2019
What was the etiology for the first failure ? Always try and identify the etiology ( at least have a very good idea ) of a failure before you repeat the procedure otherwise you potentially risk making the same mistake twice. Patients can kinda understand and accept a failure. Second time around is another story and so everything needs to be close to perfect and by the book in every way.
Dr. M. Ali , DDS,MS Prost
6/27/2019
Dear Dr. This situation is going to work and the gap will be filled under certain conditions 1- flap will be close properly notecing the gap will be full of blood and silk stitches will be removed after seeing sign of initial healing (of the tissue (. ( about 7 to 10 days ) 2-no pressure on implant site ( using denture etc. ) 3 -if there is any health issue delaying healing prophylactic antibiotics is needed 4- after proper healing time as you did befor uncover the implant and proceed with your protocol for your plan. Good luck for your case. M. Ali DDS,MS Prosthodontist
John Hoar, D.M.D.
6/27/2019
Agree with Dok- it is always best to identify the cause of a failure, even though we often cannot. Two possibilities come to mind : one is surgical error i.e. overheating the bone during prep and the other common one is overloading that with a provisional. Although neither may be appropriate, something different happened in that area. It is so easy to be critical and for that I apologize, but one thought is that Misch recommended six months usually in this portion of the maxilla even though it would have made no difference here. And, I hate gaps.
Ed Dergosits
6/27/2019
The best graft for a small gap like this is the patients own blood and good primary closure. One could also consider the use of PRF but I do not think it would be needed in a situation like this.
Dr. Gerald Rudick
6/28/2019
After the replant site has been debrided and scraped, I prefer to place a small amount of the grafting material into the osteotomy, and then screw in the implant, this way you know that you have filled the spaces between the implant body and the bone.....PRF is very good to include in the graft mixture.
Don Callan
6/28/2019
I don’t understand idea of grafting around an implant after it has been exposed to the oral fluids. It is impossible to decontaminate the implant surface. If you place a material to decontaminate the implant surface to remove and kill the bacteria, it will also indanger the fibroblast and osteoblast that are still with in the area.
Rude69.com
4/1/2020
Please let me know if you're looking for a article author for your site. You have some really great articles and I believe I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I'd really like to write some material for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an e-mail if interested. Cheers!

Featured Products

OsteoGen Bone Grafting Plug
Combines bone graft with a collagen plug to yield the easiest and most affordable way to clinically deliver bone graft for socket preservation.
CevOss Bovine Bone Graft
Make the switch to a better xenograft! High volume of interconnected pores promotes new bone. Substantially equivalent to BioOss and NuOss.