Immediate implants and retained over-denture: advice?

Pt presents with unrestorable fractured anterior (8-11) maxillary bridge and wishes to extract remaining teeth and have maxillary denture. Pt understands that his mandibular arch with also need treatment but wants to address his maxillary arch first due to his inability to smile. Pt still given treatment plan for mandibular arch. The mandibular arch will be restorations, ext's, and partial denture and in the distant future implant retained over-denture(locators). For maxillary arch, Pt presented with tx plans: (1.) full arch maxillary ext and immediate denture. (2.) Full arch ext with immediate denture w/ placement of implants (delayed) and implant retained over-denture. (locators- RT-x) 3. 9-11 implant bridge. CBCT scan taken prior to tx plan presentation to make sure patient is candidate for implants. Pt chose option 1. Pt only has high blood pressure(controlled), non smoker, non-diabetic. 65yrs old.

First I have to say this is definitely not my first rode on placing and restoring implants(especially over-dentures). My practice patient base is 90% dentures and implants.(think general dentist doing prostho and placing implants that are within my skill level. I have a wonderful surgeon for the more difficult cases) I have probably successfully treated over 200+ over-denture patients and I have developed a system that I love and is very predictable. I am no expert but I am no novice either. I have placed implants immediate and delayed, but never done full arch immediate with so many extraction sockets and I worry about maxillary resorption.

My maxillary sequence is usually to take CBCT and not promise patients implants until I have extracted the teeth and determined whether I would need bone grafting of not. I wait about 6 months and then take Dual CBCT scans with patients denture to determine position of implants and then either freehand or 3D print my own guides using blue-sky. My implants or choice are Nobel Biocare or Megagen.

My question on this patient is..... after looking at the the CBCT, I like the positioning of the patient's maxillary teeth(centered within ridge, for possible immediate extraction and placement of five or six dental implants for immediate denture and then over denture. I have reviewed a fair amount of literature and it does not address the grafting of adjacent extraction sockets. I would assume that grafting would include jump gaps as well as adjacent sockets and then coverage with cytoplast or membrane of choice (which I have used many times before)? Literature also suggests that maxillary bone tends to resorb more than mandibular bone. If you were performing this case, would you immediately place and would you graft adjacent extraction sockets? My post-op will be to leave denture out for 4-6 weeks regardless. Thank You very much for reading all of this and would welcome your advice.









28 Comments on Immediate implants and retained over-denture: advice?

New comments are currently closed for this post.
Juan Fabrega
5/18/2020
At the end, amount = out. Thanks again.
lwallacedds
5/18/2020
This is an often seen condition. The decisions for extractions, immediate or delayed implant loading, and overall treatment planning is changing in our current environment. There are many options available to provide what the patient wants and needs, what they can afford, and how convenience for the patient (and doctor) are important factors. In the current state of dentistry, when it reopens, cash flow will be a real factor and can be addressed directly. With overdenture implant cases cost can be a real factor in treatment decisions. I am presenting webinars with Zest Corporation this week to demonstrate how dentures and implant overdentures are gaining acceptance due to affordability, convenience and meeting expectations. The link to the webinar is below for this Thursday, on the Zest Dental website, link below. https://register.gotowebinar.com/register/3876219798625483277
BT
5/18/2020
Nice Case. I would suggest doing an immediate as area can be grafted properly. would also suggest you consider gingival height and position implants accordingly. I also would suggest keeping implants as level as possible and recommend angling the distal last implants back to get better A-P spread for first molar function. As to grafting, i would graft and I would also use the bone from the possible Bone reduction you may have to perform. Good luck!
Peter Hunt
5/18/2020
With the experience level that you have, it seems surprising that the patient is the one driving the treatment plan. You should be prepared to recommend to the patient the treatment plan that you feel is the best for him that you can achieve at the various financial levels available. In terms of socket grafting, the answer is that the final result will be better with this. There are many options available but one consideration should be to use a “slow-resorbing” material as this will be more likely to achieve a better long term result. Mixing this with autogenous bone will help the result as well. In terms of immediate vs. delayed, the problem here as some have said is that it can be difficult to get the implants at the right level with immediate placement. This option can also lead to over- loading the implants unless you splint all the implants in a provisional bridge. It may well be easier and simpler to concentrate on the extractions, socket debridement and grafting then on placing an immediate full maxillary denture. This will allow the patient to see how difficult it can be for him to get used to a full denture, and encourage him to have the implants in 2-3 months. It breaks the case down to simpler staging and treatment planning. It may also influence him to get the problems in the mandibular arch sorted out at the same time, which might help overall. So with your guidance, you can help the patient choose a treatment plan that you feel comfortable in providing. This is a big case, you want to be sure that you can start and finish it in a staged, progressive way with a good end point in mind. Good luck with it!
Juan Fabrega
5/18/2020
Thank you for your input Peter Hunt. I would just like to add that while I do take patient’s wishes into consideration, I want to be clear that patient’s choose between the tx plans presented to them not the other way around. It seems you misunderstood. Also to your comment regarding staging, I agree that waiting is always a predictable method that is why I always stage the maxilla (As I listed above) especially for the reasons you suggested. My question was geared more towards immediate placement next to adjacent extraction sockets and grafting for the purposes of shorting healing time.
Juan
5/18/2020
Thanks for the advice!
Bill McFatter
5/18/2020
Some input from another denture guy like yourself. ? Based on the very limited info you provided Without lower treatment plan you are asking for problems if you are planning implants You need to know how you are going to get posterior support. If you do an anterior implant bridge then you will have the same forces that destroyed the previous anterior bridge and that will be trouble If this is your locator design then that is a failure-In the max you will need to splint to protect the implants and while you may have great experience with maxillary locator retained OD this placement is dangerous. without a clear image of the lower I can't tell you much but lets say you get the implants in the upper and you then realize that you need to take the lowers out and he wants lower fixed because that is the only way to get him posterior support but he has spent all his money in the max. do you think that an upper supported prosthesis will be kind to a lower denture? If he's in a hurry then do the upper denture Get the lower treatment planned then decide where to go with the upper based on your lower (total) treatment plan That is the safe way to proceedJMHO Bill McFatter
Juan
5/18/2020
Bill, I understand what your saying but I guess where I’m confused is where you talk about the patient later wanting fixed work on the lower. I feel removable is better for him and his hygiene. The staging would be to mount casts and see how much reduction the patient would need for implant retained OVD. Then begin with the maxilla and in time proceed with the mandible. Posterior support at first would be partial denture and in time Implant retained OVD. While I agree that fixed lower would be great, I don’t think the patient is a good candidate For many reasons. So I think OVD would be more kind than fixed against an upper. Am I wrong on my assessment?
Bill McFatter
5/18/2020
I’m actually referring to implanted supported lower fixed or removable For me the critical element is posterior support. Doing an upper denture does not prevent your doing implants later in the maxilla. The denture will show you the stability issues you will have with implants. It will show you the forces you have to resist -you have only 3occluding teeth in the mandible. That will create a stability challenges That the implants will mask for awhile Bill
Juan
5/18/2020
Bill, So I agree with your assessment of stability and I agree he needs posterior support that’s why we planned a partial denture opposing. Do you not consider a partial denture on the mandible adequate for providing more posterior support to stabilize maxillary denture? Please explain. Are you suggesting I treat mandible first with implants then go to maxilla and treatment plan implants?
Mwjddsms
5/18/2020
Here's my 2 cents worth on this discussion. 1) Yes, a mandibular partial denture will provide good stability for a maxillary denture. 2) I agree with Bill. Good advice about posterior support. It's the only way a maxillary denture is successful. 3) Bill Is correct. Put the money into the mandible. It's the weakest jaw for removable prosthetics. Make a fixed hybrid, keep at least a millimeter gap at the intaglio surface and make in convex for ease of cleaning. Patients love a fixed solution rather than a snap on that need clip changes (at least in my practice). 4) My favorite treatment plan, in this situation, that creates the best value, function and comfort is a maxillary complete denture and a mandibular hybrid prosthesis. Maxillary implants only if there's a reason, i.e. gag reflex or loss of taste or want something fixed. You should be treatment planning both arches together. Develop a full mouth plan so patient doesn't overspend on maxilla like Bill discussed. Follow Bills suggestions, he has good info. Also, why do you think an overdenture is kinder to the maxillary denture? That makes no sense. We make maxillary dentures against mandibular natural dentition all the time. Give the patient a solid mandibular dentition and it will stabilize the maxillary denture. Then, if needed, follow up with implants in the maxilla later.
Bill
5/19/2020
A lower partial opposing a max denture is a good treatment plan and adequate posterior support However when you begin to add implants to the max all of the parameters change. The long term risk in the upper denture case is loss of the premax as the occlusion become premature on the anterior denture due to posterior wear. With an implant retained OD it’s implant loss You know that a lower denture is difficult in the best of cases. You also know that having natural upper teeth opposed to a lower denture is generally a failure. You don’t want to end up with the patient spending their “implant” budget on the max when it would have been better spent in the mandible wher it can really help. At this point you don’t know what you and the patients best option is overall All I’m saying is that to jump into a treatment plan with implant s in the maxilla and no plan for the lower that has been discussed with the patient in a dx discovery is doing them an injustice and a potentiall aggravating relationship. So upper denture with appropriate grafting treatment plan the lowe based on what the Pt wants as a result. Bill M
Dale Gerke, BDS, BScDent(
5/18/2020
My first comment is that it seems to me from the radiographs that most existing teeth are salvageable and could be restored. However I understand that a clinical exam is required before a definitive conclusion can be made. Secondly is that the case does not seem too hard if you (or the patient) insist on full clearance. The ridge height and width seem good. I think your comment of extract and delay implants is good. If you want to graft at extraction then fine but probably it is not required especially if you intend to implant within 2 months of extraction. My suggestion is to look into Ethoss bone graft information. It is ideal for this situation and Peter Fairbairn has a lot of tutorial information on the internet about how to use the material and he has published his results over 15 years. The graft material is minimalistic (ie no membrane required), quick and easy to use and the results are very good. Having said this, I suggest you consider extractions (no graft), then leave the site for 4-5 weeks, then raise flaps and implant and graft if required. You could decide whether to 1 or 2 stage placement at the time of surgery but I would expect 1 stage should be fine. I would use a surgical guide and aim to place parallel implants using CADCAM design. However from a prosthetic aspect, I would suggest you consider only 4 implants if you are to do a locator retained denture. 5 implants would be over kill I think. I generally only place 4 implants and activate 3 locator denture inserts. I find if 4 locator denture inserts are used then the denture is far too retentive and the patient gets quite upset when the denture is initially inserted (because it is too hard to remove). After a “wearing in” period, I sometimes activate the fourth locator denture insert but in the majority of cases the patients do not want me to do this. The reason I still have 4 implants is to have a “spare” in case one fails or if a locator wears or breaks. You will already know that locators have a habit of wearing in some cases. As an extra suggestion for you to consider (either now or in the future) is a vertical bar/ shoe/ overdenture. The bar and shoe are: CADCAM designed, milled metal frames with “dolder” type clips milled into the bar and a plastic retainer system milled into the shoe. These are amazingly retentive and the resistance is brilliant. The cost is higher but the value is greater. The only drawback (as with all bar systems) is that the gingiva sometimes becomes hyperplastic and fills in the “gingival-bar” gap which can make cleaning of the implants difficult. If a bar is a possible option (either now if in the future) then 5 implants would be fine. It looks like a good case – but lastly, could I suggest that you discuss this with your usual oral surgeon and ask for his/her thoughts. I am sure the surgeon would be willing to make some relevant comments. It certainly would do no harm to ask.
Juan
5/18/2020
Thanks for the advice!
Mwjddd,ms
5/18/2020
It seems clear to me from your question that, even though you have done a lot of implants, your level of fully edentulous implant restorative experience is extremely low. The patient wants a denture. Why graft the sockets and add unwarranted cost to the procedure? Remove the teeth, make a temporary denture, follow healing for 6-8 months then make a final denture. Easy. Now, if the patient wants implants that's a different story. What implant restoration are you proposing? Fixed ceramometal or ceramozirconia restorations? Then graft the sites, plan your implant restoration, decide how many and where the implants should go then make a surgical guide and place the implants. A hybrid? Then no grafting needed because you'll be reducing the ridge anyway. Possibly extract, level alveolus and place implants at the same time. Maxillary bar retained overdenture? Again, grafting is not needed since there needs to be bone reduction to create space for the bar and overstructures. I rarely, if every, use locators in the maxilla. Only if you can get them spaced out to fully support the denture and make sure they are reasonably parallel. Otherwise, it's a bar/clip overdenture. If your locators are anterior then any function posteriorly will cause the locators to pop loose over time. Very frustrating for the patient and you. Figure out what the patients needs and wants are, then guide the patient to the best treatment for him or her. You need to have the skills to perform any of the above treatments for the fully edentulous otherwise refer to a specialist that can do the more complex care. Only presenting your limited knowledge of a locator overdenture is a disservice to the patient.
Juan
5/18/2020
Thanks for the comment. More advice less personal commentary. Don’t need a troll, need a colleague.
Mwjddd,ms
5/18/2020
Sorry you aren't interested in constructive advise from a specialist. There are times when specialists are needed. This may be one of them. Surgical or pros.
Juan
5/18/2020
You are correct. Keyword there is Specialist, which I would consider a colleague and possible mentor who I hold in high esteem. You sir do not conduct yourself as such. Have a wonderful day. Please troll somewhere else.
Mwjddd,ms
5/18/2020
you seem to take constructive criticism as trolling. You may want to read your post. It says your practice is 90% dentures and implants and you've done over 200 overdentures. I appreciate your skill set. My only comment is that, if you're holding yourself to a specialist standard then you should be treatment planning like a specialist. You are asking for advice, which is good, but have you thought about your plan if implants are to be used? No where in your question did you once discuss a treatment plan other than an overdenture and this seems to be your only answer to an implant restoration. As a specialist, any surgeon or prosthodontist will tell you there's multiple ways to treat the edentulous patient and each treatment requires different bone levels, different numbers of implants, different positions of implants and the restorative plan will dictate the surgical plan. You are doing it backwards by asking about surgical questions when you haven't determined a restorative treatment plan. My favorite line is "you don't know what you don't know". I am not trolling you, I only want you to understand that if you want to do specialty work (surgery and prosthodontics) then you will be held to the level of a specialist. This includes fully informing the patient of all the different treatment options first then determining surgical needs secondarily. Not everyone wants a locator overdenture. I wish you all the luck as you continue on your education to be a fully rounded surgeon and restorative dentist.
Juan
5/18/2020
See that wasn’t so hard. Ok. So for this case we did discuss fixed options with implant placement by a specialist but cost obviously wasn’t a factor which it is with every patient and I’m not going to propose treatment I know they can’t afford and that I’m not familiar with. We can’t simply blanket the best most expensive treatment plan out there. Cost is a real factor as well as future cost of replacement of the fixed prosth. You can’t buy a Ferrari and expect to get your oil changes at jiffy lube. The other thing I wanted to point out is that If you go back you can see that my denture treatment plans included immediate denture with/without implants as a treatment plan. Why would I plan what you suggested when I know the patient cannot afford it. Discussing it with the patient is still considered informing the patient of his options. While I do invite constructive criticism, which is more personal commentary on your part, not answering my question and pontificating on a topic I did not ask isn’t what I’m looking for. Once again this large discussion and you still never answered my question. When you extract teeth and place immediate adjacent implants to extraction sockets, even after reduction, to create space for whatever prosthetic you are planning, will grafting w/ barrier membrane prevent the resorption of the ridge Or do we still see possible thread exposures. It seems like many articles that I have read do not touch upon this. I would assume that it would resorb but not to the level as not grafting. Is this a worry OS has when deciding to perform immediate consecutive implants next to extraction sockets? Should one assume to always graft adjacent sockets?
Mwjddsms
5/18/2020
holy cow! First, I'm assuming you meant that cost IS a factor, and yes, it always is. And you just admitted that you don't recommend treatment you're not familiar with. You've done 200 or more overdentures. But you only have one treatment plan. so everyone gets the same treatment. That is wrong. I can't tell you how many patients I've seen for opinions after the fact that don't like their locator overdentures. When I propose other treatment options they say "why wasn't I told about those choices?" It's because you don't know what you don't know. So.... you need to inform them even if you don't have the skill set. It's your responsibility. You don't have the skills ? Refer. Why did I get off topic about your bone graft? You discussed simply a denture so I told you no bone graft is needed. You then asked, bone graft adjacent to implants and I asked, what is your plan? May or may not need to graft. The surgeons on this thread can answer your surgical questions but I want you to think about what your final result is and do you really need to bone graft. that's the beauty of osseonews. You get info from all specialties. So, as a general dentist, take the specialists advice and learn. you are lucky enough to get both surgical and prosthetic questions and answers. Now was that so hard?
Juan
5/18/2020
Nice try at deflection with the fake hysteria. Not gonna let you off the hook though because Its obvious you don’t have an answer regarding the surgery question. Lets try this again since you failed to comprehend. Several treatment plans are discussed like any other practice, including any that would be referred out. This would be standard protocol. Next, if there are any procedures or tx plans the patient wishes to discuss that I am not familiar with I don’t tend to propose them because I am not an expert in that procedure. That doesn’t mean that I don’t discuss what knowledge I may have with them about that procedure but I won’t be proposing it to be done in my practice even though it may be something they may want to consider at another practice. That’s why second opinions exist. I don’t try to convince patients of anything. I simply present the facts/pros/cons. I usually allow those patients to seek the opinion of a specialist or another dentist. That is what I mean when I say I don’t propose treatment I am not familiar with. This should be obvious because I’m guessing your not an expert in all things everything and will not be proposing treatment your not familiar with? Or maybe you do or pretend to with your patients. Also your right, osseonews is great because I get to the seek the opinions of everyone, it’s also great because it allows me to find out who knows how to actually answer questions properly and it allows me to get info from multiple people not just one individual. So to end, not everyone gets a denture, but since we are a denture practice most of our patients see us for that very reason. Again thanks for “great” answers to questions that were never asked and your right. I don’t know what I don’t know. Thanks for the giving me the one liner everyone knows. It’s a line that can be applied to everything because it assumes not everyone knows everything which I never said I did. You did. You know everything. Except the answer to my original question.
sergio
5/19/2020
Couldn't have said better myself.
roadkingdoc
5/19/2020
Thanks for posting. From what I can see on the pictures,I would remove the compromised teeth. I would wait around 3 months. Do splinted crowns 5 and 6, 12 and 13? Do a precision attachment PD. I practice in a rural, economically challenged area. I do many MICD over implant retained lower dentures (usually two locators). My greatest headaches have come from maxillary implant retained dentures. In my experience that's a complex restoration. I think anything less than splinted implants is asking for trouble. I know this doesn't answer your question. Just another opinion on your case. Much luck to you. 42 yrs and still learning.
Juan
5/19/2020
Thank you for you advice. I did think of those restorations with splinted crowns and presented them. It was denied but since my practice is in a rural area and I have a good relationship with many of my patients I may revisit It due to the fact that I would like to have him treat the mandible sooner rather than later. It is a good option to help him retain some dentition while spreading the cost of treatment and getting the patient the ROI. I agree that all maxillary overdentures are complex but with splinting and locators I feel that could be a restoration in the future for his maxilla. Thank you.
Bill
5/19/2020
Again, don't do splinted crowns in the upper until you have a lower treatment plan You are better doing acrylic upper partial to buy time until you can develop a comprehensive plan Bill M
Juan
5/19/2020
Again. I think everyone understands that a comprehensive plan for the mandible is needed and that is why I have set up one. Please re- read original post. The plan to fix salvageable teeth teeth and begin with a partial denture is a plan and the patient understands and will be in that treatment plan. I’m not sure how that wasn’t understood. Are you saying that precision partial on max( sagiix/era) With splinted crowns and plenty of palatal support and lower partial denture on mandible does not reestablish posterior support or is a inadequate tax plan then please explain. Are you saying that this is not a possible tx plan. If so please explain using mechanical engineering principles or some kind of literature prosth literature. Posterior support and plan comprehensively is not an answer I can do anything with. If your saying I don’t know enough then teach! Otherwise. Next!
roadkingdoc
5/19/2020
The lower images are are a little vague but I feel the lower could be treated similarly. I try to design in a what if factor by placing rest seats and contouring the units for clasp if one fails. I also have removed, placed implants on one side keeping the crowns on the other. I can't resist editorializing. Dentistry the only think supposed to last forever in a patients mind! Buy a 70k truck, drive it 5 yrs,lose 50% of value, gladly acceptable! LOL

Featured Products

OsteoGen Bone Grafting Plug
Combines bone graft with a collagen plug to yield the easiest and most affordable way to clinically deliver bone graft for socket preservation.
CevOss Bovine Bone Graft
Make the switch to a better xenograft! High volume of interconnected pores promotes new bone. Substantially equivalent to BioOss and NuOss.