It would be moot to repeat what everyone has already said, i.e.: explant ASAP, get training before further placing implants AND, closely monitor this patient!
I've already posted a long comment outlining the egregious mistakes made here, the gross oversight of details, and total lack of experience that led to the cascade of unfortunate events which generated this gross failure. I had also included, among other things, the requisite criticism that I truly feel our colleague really needs to hear -- for his own sake, first and foremost! Alas, presumably, the site moderators didn't see fit to publish my critical post, because it was, well, critical -- even though it was well within the norms of civility and professionalism.
However, in restricting said critical speech -- 1st Amendment anyone? -- the moderators are not only stifling debate but, are also making themselves guilty of censure and are missing a very crucial, indeed essential point: Aside from open discussion and sharing experience, one of the purposes of this board is to have the opportunity to openly admit mistakes in a safe environment -- and read our peers' honest opinions -- without fear of legal consequence. That also means sometimes hearing criticism, stern as it may be! For, let's not forget, that some of the best and durable lessons we learned were born of stern criticism levied at us by our educators. Let's also remember that sometimes, someone really needs stern, vigorous criticism, because it's the only thing standing between them and the next blunder!
Our esteemed colleague really needed that criticism, because if no one tells him how utterly wrong he went, how will he ever know? And this speaks not only to this particular case, but to our colleague's limited experience as well as his overall attitude and approach, which also appear lacking, and bordering on light-hearted. If no one attracts his attention sternly enough to make a bulb go off, and make him take a step back to re-evaluate himself, HOW in the world will he ever know that he needs to do so?!? He may feel slighted for a moment but then, as reason sets in, he will rethink and ask himself the serious questions which will inevitably lead him to definitive self-improvement as a professional! And isn't that the other purpose of this board -- to improve ourselves and to foster same in others? Improvement sometimes has a cost in pride. But better a momentarily stunted pride than a dead patient and a multi-million dollar lawsuit OR, worse yet, a whole career curtailed. This WAS one of those very rare cases within that possible realm, IMHO!
Sadly this case doesn't just border on malpractice, it is malpractice, and it's much better for our colleague to hear it from us here, than from plaintiff's attorney! Saying otherwise is not doing our colleague any favors! Worst of all, by failing to alert him to the potential severity of the situation, we are preventing him from taking the immediate and clear steps necessary to safeguard his patient and himself. In a sense, we become complicit in his errors and their consequences. N'èst pas?
I therefore encourage all of you, my esteemed colleagues whom I respect and whose insightful posts I appreciate, to follow my suit! "If you see something, say something" should apply here as well, not only to 'suspicious packages'! Gross, truly egregious errors must be called out by name, especially if they endanger a patient's life even if only 1%. That is our Hippocratic oath! Speaking frankly isn't a crime, but a red alert to a colleague that he/she needs to take a step back and thoroughly re-evaluate the situation. So please pardon the cliché, but as Shakespeare famously said "a rose by any other name is still called a flower"! In our profession that "flower" can have dire -- even deadly -- consequences!
And to the moderators, I encourage you to let criticism stand, when it's decidedly called for! There are very rare instances when one serious lapse can cost a life, or a whole career. I highly doubt you wish to make yourselves complicit to a potential disaster! Further, and with sincere all due respect, I highly doubt that you are sufficiently professionally qualified to stand in judgement of such clinical issues! Cheers!