PTFE Membrane or Resorbable?
Last Updated: Mar 19, 2007
Dr. C. asks:
I placed a dental implant in in the #4, 5 area 5-years ago using a 2-stage surgical protocol. The implant was restored with a cement retained PFM. The patient had excellent home care and minimal pocket depth.
Then the patient started chemotherapy for cancer. About that time, the implant started having problems with pocketing and suppuration on the palatal. The patient is doing an excellent job keeping the dental implant clean and is using subgingival irrigation, chlorhexidine, etc. But there is bone loss now down to the 4th thread (about 30 percent of a 4mmx12mm).
I am proposing removal of crown and abutment, detoxifying the implant fixture with citric acid, and grafting, then coverage with a barrier membrane to attempt bone regrowth. Which is preferable in this case: a ptfe membrane or a resorbable membrane? If so, which and why? How successful have been your experiences been with this technique? Any other suggestions?
14 Comments on PTFE Membrane or Resorbable?
Mike H.
03/21/2007
MSG
03/22/2007
Ziv Mazor
03/22/2007
Robert J. Miller
03/23/2007
SFOMS
03/28/2007
satish joshi
03/31/2007
Dr. Bill Woods
08/16/2007
gumdoc
09/07/2007
Dr. Gerald Rudick
09/20/2007
MSG
09/29/2007
Amer
10/16/2007
tom cady
08/16/2010
Elie W. DDS
08/18/2010
Featured Products
Classic 50/50 Mix
Promotes osteoconduction
Provides structural integrity
Convenient Syringe!
50/50 Cortical/Cancellous
Available in 3 sizes.
Eliminate hassle of mixing particulate grafts
Sold in packs of 5 or packs of 10.
Proven safe, and clinically effective
Resorbable collagen membrane derived from purified porcine pericardium
Fast hydration and excellent tensile strength
Good adaptation to various defects
Excellent tear function and duration
100% allograft
Eliminates mixing hassle
Moldable after hydration
anon
03/20/2007