Removing Implant by Minimal Reverse Torque?

Dr. I asks:

Can a dental implant that appears both clinically and radiographically integrated be removed by minimal reverse torque?

The reason for my question is that recently I have experienced a number of failures with a particular implant. Prior to using this implant, I had experienced about 2% failure rate. In this particular case I placed two implants in the maxillary first premolar area, when the implant placed in the # 5 site failed shortly after loading (the implant appeared both clinically and radiographically integrated), I removed the crown and abutment from the implant in the # 12 site to see if I could remove by applying reverse torque using the manufacturers ratchet and with slight force I was surprised to find the implant began to come out.

I did not think this was possible, but may explain the high number of failures I have noted since using this implant. I have since stopped using this implant, but worry about the twenty implants from this company that I have already placed. The patient in this case was a healthy 70 year old female, implants were placed in native bone D3 and given a full 6 months to integrate before uncovering. At the time of uncovering no crestal bone loss was noted. Radiographically it appeared that bone was intimately adapted to the implant body the full length of the implants. Any feed-back is appreciated. I am not sure how to proceed.

6 Comments on Removing Implant by Minimal Reverse Torque?

New comments are currently closed for this post.
Alejandro Berg
5/20/2008
Yes they can (unfortunatelly), if you want to be sure use contra torque every time. also periotest(not my favorite) can help. Ostell is also a good tool but finally good contra torque (40Ncm) will give you peace of mind. best of luck
SFOMS
5/20/2008
What is the brand/surface technology of the said failed implant?
Bruce G Knecht
5/21/2008
I have removed three and they reverse torque right out nicely. Now they were only in at most three months. Two were lower implants I removed them due to thread exposure and I felt that it was better to sink them deeper than graft.
William Chong
5/27/2008
Implants which appear clinically and radiographically osseointegrated and can be reversed by minimal reverse torque are not integrated and are best removed. Your 2% failure rate is acceptable and you are a good surgeon. Suggest reviewng protocol to see what changes you have made besides the brand switch. If your recent switch is between two tapered implant brands or 2 parallel sided implants unlikely that protocol is no issue. If you are switching from parallel sided to tapered or vice versa, there is a need to review your protocol as they have a different feel upon insertion. The other common cause is when dealing with immediate extraction sites where there could be a leftover granulation tissue undetected. Finally while I do not think it is necessarily a problem with one brand or other, I would opt for a surface modified, i.e rough surface implant rather than a first generation smooth surface Ti.
ash
5/28/2008
yes , what is this implant brand?...use an implant surface treated with ("cell plus,tiunite,sla")..claim to have faster better integration
peter Shieh
6/26/2008
can you tell us which brand of implant that failed? Radiographs does not reveal much.Pain is a good indication while torquing the abutment

Featured Products

OsteoGen Bone Grafting Plug
Combines bone graft with a collagen plug to yield the easiest and most affordable way to clinically deliver bone graft for socket preservation.
CevOss Bovine Bone Graft
Make the switch to a better xenograft! High volume of interconnected pores promotes new bone. Substantially equivalent to BioOss and NuOss.