Implants in One Visit With Guided Full Mouth Restorations

Case submitted by: 3D Diagnostix
Images Courtesy of: Dr. Engel, from Engel Dental Center.

The introduction of Guided Surgery to implant dentistry has brought multiple benefits to both the planning and surgical aspects of the workflow. Predictable placement, faster patient recovery and less chair time are some of the main advantages to utilizing the new technology. Switching to a top-to-bottom planning approach where aesthetic results are given more priority has opened the door for dentists to take more control of the prosthetic aspect of their implant cases and have CAD/CAM provisional crowns designed and delivered at the time of surgery.

Today, solutions like 3DDX Guided Full Mouth Restorations make it possible for full mouth rehabilitation procedures that allow you to give your edentulous patients implants and teeth in a single visit.

In the following example, a 44 year old female patient presented with a semi edentulous mandible. All remaining teeth had suffered severe attrition. The patient already had an all-on-4 denture in the maxilla.

A diagnostic Vatech CBCT scan (Fig. 1) was acquired and then uploaded to 3DDX to start the planning phase. After filling in the case requirements and uploading the DICOM data through the 3DDX Connect secure portal, Dr. Engel mailed in patient impressions and a bite registration that were digitized at 3DDX via laser scanning to aid in implant planning and the creation of a digital wax up.
3DDX Dentists received the case and prepared it for planning in the 3DDX implant planning software (Fig. 2) then created an all-on-6 Straumann Bone-Level Tapered implant plan according to Dr. Engel’s instructions (Fig.3).

Implants were planned in positions #19 (4.8x10mm), #20 (4.1x10mm), #24 & #25 (3.3x12mm) and finally #29 & #30 (4.1x10mm). All remaining teeth were planned for extraction which was virtually simulated on the software.

The next step was designing the components of 3DDX Guided Full Mouth Restorations by the 3DDX Restorations team. First, the pin-positioning guide (Fig. 6) is designed to make sure the fixation pins on the Base (Bone Reduction Guide) will be accurately positioned during surgery.
After that, the Snap-In Bone Reduction Guide (Fig.7) is designed. This guide has a double purpose, both as a bone leveling guide and the base on which all the following steps are built. The four fixation pins provide additional stability during surgery.
The Snap-In implant Surgical Guide (Fig. 8) is designed to fit securely on top of the Bone Reduction Guide to allow for sub-millimetric accuracy and full control over both the osteotomy and implant placement procedures. The key-locking mechanisms on both sides provide extra stability during surgery and act as indicators that the guide is fitting as planned.

For this case, it was determined that angled abutments will be required. To ensure perfect alignment with the planned Hybrid Denture, an Abutment Guide (Fig. 10) is necessary. The design is also made to fit on top of the Snap-In Bone Reduction Guide and has indented markings for accurate positioning of the angled abutments (Fig. 11).

Finally, a temporary hybrid screw-retained restoration (Fig. 12) was designed by a 3DDX Prosthodontist using the data available from the CBCT, the Implant Plan and the Digital Wax-Up.

Dr. Engel was updated with every planning step and once the phase was completed, he reviewed and confirmed that the plan followed his instructions. All parts were then sent into production and mailed to Dr. Engel in the same week.





























9 Comments on Implants in One Visit With Guided Full Mouth Restorations

New comments are currently closed for this post.
Dr. Gerald Rudick
4/17/2019
My compliments to Dr. Engel for a job well planned and well done.
Andy
4/17/2019
serious cajones for this case.....congrats. However the photos and panorex seem to justify in my practice some ridge augmentation LR with couple implants and endo/P&C/Crowns and bridges restoration of lower arch.......don't know what's upstairs but, if removable, even more so. Your case finished very well....thanks for posting
Andy
4/17/2019
Just saw initial Pano and intro of AO4 on top
Manosteel
4/17/2019
I was always taught to not cross the mental foramina with a solid connection/prosthesis. It looks like that has been done on both sides with implants in the second bicuspid locations. What is the consensus on this? Are th second bi's close enough to the mandibular foramina to overcome mandibular warping effects?
Ed Dergosits
4/17/2019
Manosteel I personally have never seen a problem as you describe. Perhaps I am misunderstanding. Is the theory that the mandible will flex distal to the mental foramina and this will somehow cause the restoration to fail because the most distal implants get stressed? What types of failures did the lecturers describe? I have seen many cases that have serviced for more than 10 years without problems in situations like this.
Ed Dergosits
4/17/2019
Very well planned and performed surgery with immediate provisional restoration. Seeing patients receive such a fantastic outcome in one appointment is inspirational. How many hours was the patient in the office the say of surgery? Congrats to you. Your patient is lucky to have found a dentist with such skills.
Sam
4/20/2019
With all respect for your work and effort, in my opinion according to the clinical photos and OPG all remaining teeth look restorable. Two implants in lower right and one in lower left combined with endo on canines and some prosthetic work would have been gained this patient mush better than this.
Fred
4/23/2019
Very nice case. Great job! I do my cases very similarly and the guide I use is almost exactly like this. However I loved that your guide has a pin positioning aspect to it before the teeth are even removed. Brilliant! My question is once the teeth are removed and you have to place the foundation/bone reduction guide, is it fairly easy just to place the bone reduction guide and find the proper position with the holes already prepared? My guide does not have this aspect and I have remove all the teeth, flap the ridge, and then find the exact position of the bone reduction guide on the ridge. Then I drill my pin holes. It can be really hard to know if the guide is in the perfect position!
Todd Engel
4/25/2019
Hello and thank you all for your great comments! When I treatment plan these types of cases (which is currently what my practice is limited to), there are several factors that I take into consideration beyond the actual dentistry and various ways to “fix” things. A few factors include the psychology of the patient (expectations, duration of expectations, as we know maintenance and the potential need to re-do or repair is ((or definitely should be)) a consideration) the age (I consider youth to be a big factor versus even geriatric) should absolutely be considered as well. If the patient is in their 30’s, 40’s or even 50’s (which this one is) and lives a normal/extended life span of 88 years, would crown and bridge be an option, is it the better option? Possibly, however my job as her clinician is to present these facts (which is actually what patients complain most about when not receiving the "details") and allow her to spend her investment, potential future costs as well as the chair time and healing time as she wishes, but at least she’s appropriately informed. Next, I examine "how" they present....are they capable of impeccable home care? Have they neglected their part of the responsibility to keep themselves and their dentistry clean and prolong it? So now, I will answer a few individual questions provided and please know MY WAY ISN'T THE ONLY WAY, IT'S SIMPLY THE ONE THAT EXHIBITS MOST SUCCESS FOR ME. I say that because your minds are brilliant and it doesn't mean I disagree with any of you. Lastly, (I say Lastly, but its really not) I examine their existing occlusion and what I may be “addressing” with their route of choice. Dr GR - "thank you for your comments, I actually pride myself most on my planning and my dialogue with my patients to ensure a harmonious outcome". Andy- "I completely feel your option is a valid one and one that should be presented to the patient (which I did), however based on her desire to avoid (or limit) her future need to more dentistry on this arch, my personal option was to advise this route of care. There were other large factors as well; 1) she was extremely over-closed. Her previous DDS did the maxillary hybrid and despite promising "porcelain teeth", gave her an acrylic hybrid on 7mm of space.... she's was breaking everything. My plan is to also re-do her maxillary prosthetics and open her VDO over-time. The reason I mention this, is because endo had to also be a consideration for all remaining lower teeth to even consider C&B. The treatment plan was getting out of control financially and I still wouldn't tell her she'd have long term successful equal to the fixed hybrid (IMHO). When looking at all of these factors and explanations, this is what we chose together, but I respect your approach completely. Andy (2) - yes, on the Pano, but that wasn't even near the whole story...i feel really good about our direction and outcome. I really feel she received the correct service, but thank you again. Manosteel (love the name) - excellent question, and this is something that does have some merit. However, I've personally seen a tremendous amount of success with hundreds of full arches as I'm showing here. I do approximately 80-100 arches a year and have yet to personally experience issues from implant position and it relates to stress areas. One reason "could be" that I don't typically go posterior to the 2nd bi, as you've stated, as this will allow me plenty of AP spread to provide first molar to first molar occlusion. I'm very aware that several people share your concept and many avoid what you're stating, however I've not had 1 issue to date (this is my 12th year of completing this type of care) in my hands/planning. Thank you for the very astute inquiry. Ed D - thank you for your compliments...I appreciate them more than you know. I've been providing/teaching implant dentistry for 18 years and love what I do. I love helping people (my colleagues included) and avoiding poor outcomes and disappointed patients...so planning is imperative!!! IF YOU CAN'T SEE IT, IT WON'T HAPPEN! I think I also commented to your response to Manosteel as well. Lastly, these cases take me approximately 2-2.5 hours total, from starting my IV to walking them out the door. Sam - "thank you . Again, I fully respect your opinion and process of thinking, however I feel treatment plans and outcomes of those plans are largely driven by communication with the patient, which is never added to the case presentations we all see. After presenting options and taking her health, social habits, etc into consideration, I'm very pleased (for her and I) to know that she's "virtually" done and in a good place. Thanks again! Fred - "thank you". Again, I really appreciate the fact that one professional compliments another....really cool! So, your question about the pins and transferring placement of the guides. It should be noted that there are many ways to attain a guide. Some of us make them ourselves. My preference is to focus on the patient, the surgery, the sedation, the planning and the outcome, and allow my guide maker (who is way more proficient than I) to make my guide. That said, I use (and always will) 3DDX for all thing "guided" as shown here. (BTW, disclaimer - I have no financial vested interest if you buys guides for them). So, in a case where you are doing full mouth immediate placement , with conversion and loaded PMMA's, it all starts with "what exists". Meaning as you see the first guide placement over the existing teeth, the four anchor pins holes that are drilled, are pre-planned to also accommodate the reduction guide in those very same holes. make sense? The key factor, (and one place where many will go wrong if they're not careful) is to make sure you've elevated a sufficient tissue reflection to accommodate the reduction coping in it's appropriate position. This is also why I suture much of the soft tissue "away" as even though it's been reflected, it also needs to stay away and not inhibit the bone guide from seating! If not, everything following that (implant, provisional, etc) won't go as planned! This could make for a VERY long and frustrating day...with some panic. I'm happy to answer more here but some who aren't sure or haven't been exposed to large flap concepts, should become more familiar with that prior to attempting these types of cases. So, that said....thank you all for the wonderful comments, my plane is getting ready to land, so I must shut down now. My best to all of you and I will watch for more comments hold you have them. I do teach a "live" patient program where by all attending doctors get a full arch themselves (like shown) with me chair side to assist you. Look at engelinstitute.com - the Mentoring 4 class. Take care

Featured Products

OsteoGen Bone Grafting Plug
Combines bone graft with a collagen plug to yield the easiest and most affordable way to clinically deliver bone graft for socket preservation.
CevOss Bovine Bone Graft
Make the switch to a better xenograft! High volume of interconnected pores promotes new bone. Substantially equivalent to BioOss and NuOss.