Time for fractured buccal bone resorption during ridge split?
I am curious to know how long does it takes for the fractured buccal bone during the ridge split procedure to resorb if it has to resorb. How many weeks? I understand that the bone may or may not resorb depending on the thickness, mobility, primary closure, grafting and implant placement. But if it has to resorb how long will it take to resorb?
16 Comments on Time for fractured buccal bone resorption during ridge split?
New comments are currently closed for this post.
CRS
6/5/2013
Not sure what you mean, if it is the green stick fracture of the buccal plate with grafting in between 6-8weeks a non mobile fracture but 12-16 weeks for remodeling and implant placement. The cortical bone should not resorb but remodel. Now if you are talking about a thin sequestra which might not heal but exfoliate then anywhere from 6-12 weeks.
M
6/5/2013
I mean if a buccal plate which was thick around 1.5mm fractured was mobile but did not fell down (had a attachment somewhere. A full thickness flap was raised, while splitting the buccal bone fractured, it was thick. I approximated the edges, added a graft (but not enough I believe) and covered with the membrane and approximated without the screw. the implant was placed. the buccal plate was not under any pressure after implant placement. I am worried will it get resorbed. I had submerged the implant.
M
6/5/2013
Dr. CRS sir can I have your email please.
CRS
6/8/2013
I have not heard back from Osseonews how to privately exchange emails. Anybody know how to do this?
OsseoNews
6/8/2013
As per our privacy policy, we never share your email addresses or any other contact information. If you would like someone to contact you, please simply add your website address in the website field when you post a comment. You can also put a link to a Facebook page, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, etc. in the website field, if you do not have or do not wish to use a website. All of these options provide a way for someone to contact you. Thank you for your understanding.
CRS
6/5/2013
I'll find out how to do that. At surgery I would have placed a bicortical screw to draw the cortices together since the implant will displace them. However if it is a small enough it will work its way thru. You may get a fibrous union if it is mobile. If it is along the cortex it may not affect the implant I 'd have to see a film or photo to be sure.
peter Fairbairn
6/7/2013
Difficult one ridge splitting as can be a bit of a lottery , best to keep the periosteum attached to lessen the sequestration issue .
When I am expanding a ridge and the plate fractures I generally remove the fractured bone and bin it , grafting with a particulate ( In my case synthetic which sets ) .
Hence splitting in the esthetic zone must be treated with caution.
Peter
Pynadath George
6/8/2013
Peter
Why would you bin the bone? Could you not particulate it with a grinder and use it?
Dr. Hossam Barghash
6/8/2013
first it is different if it is upper or lower case. fracture happen more in single case implant , and I wonder how you was able to put the implant while the buccal plate is fracture, the onlyway is that the apical part is still attached so you can get primary stability.so I think the question is aboiut implant primary stability stability and osseointegration
Peter Fairbairn
6/9/2013
Hi George , mainly because it is dead once fractured off and hence the bodies role is to remove it through sequestration and osteoclastic activity . Initially I used bone chips etc but stopped about 10 years ago as results were better , faster without . We have done a many cores for histo and micro CT .
Most particulates and some more than others possess a negative Zeta potential which attracts bone proteins , Osteopontin , Calcin etc , which in turn attract increased mesenchymal cells ( Osteoblasts ) to the site thus up-regulating the host response to regeneration ( see research by Hunt and Cooper ) .
Thus introducing an initial osteoclastic phase my not be beneficial , as to the old dogma " the bone has good stuff in it " , well that is all in the blood .
The concepts are as old , just forgotten possibly by marketing .
Yes Dr Hossam the upper , maxillary arch I feel is more forgiving and flexible in expansion and splitting cases
Regards
Peter
pynadath
6/9/2013
Hi Peter
but that would mean things like onlay grafts with autogenous wouldnt work so well. Do you feel you get better results with fortoss?
Peter Fairbairn
6/9/2013
Hi George , Agreed in the hands of skilled surgeons Khoury etc ( and many on here , BV etc ) they can do but we feel there may be benefits for the patients , reduced morbidity faster regeneration etc .
Many different ways work just another idea and thought trying to work with the healing process
We seem to get great results hence work this way now although do not use Fortoss anymore .
Regards
Peter
MA
6/12/2013
Hi Peter
Having seen your excellent case presentations using Fortoss, I am interested to know why you stopped using it & what is your current "setting synthetic particulate material" of choice.
Regards
Martin
Peter Fairbairn
6/12/2013
Hi Martin , it is a good material , just been pushing the concept a bit more and have been getting improved results .
But e-mail me as do not really feel this site is for marketing .
Regards
Peter
Baker Vinci
6/12/2013
The premise of the ridge split, is to keep your segments alive. These are vascularized bone" flaps" essentially. The procedure originated from the principles of the le fort one osteotomy, or any other orthognathic procedure. This is a technique sensitive procedure and has some very limited applications. Please refrain from attempting this procedure until you have seen several and had some Formal training. A lot if damage can be created with the poor split. Bvinci
CRS
6/14/2013
Great comment BV hopefully it will be heard.